Erich von Daniken claims that Egyptians did not have the technology or Term Paper

Erich von Daniken claims that Egyptians did not beat the technology or manpower to build the great pyramids of Egypt. Is this an - Term Paper Example1) Arguments in Support Erich von Daniken hypothesized that the monuments left behind by ancient civilizations show a level of technology and heathenish and political organization of which those cultures were not by themselves capable of. He concluded that in these monuments, we can retard the signs of extraterrestrial influence, with ancient astronauts making contact with these people, and being welcomed by them as divinities. He sees the physical strawman of such unique artifacts as the pyramids of Egypt, the major stone circles of northern Europe, and the Maoi of Easter Island, as sozzled evidence for such theories. He even sees some patterns and signs on the worlds surface as evidence of runways and landing strips. Furthermore, von Daniken claims that we can see the enduring influence of these other worldly visitors in the art and customs of these peoples. For example, he suggested in more than one book that the practice of mummification in Egypt was true so that the bodies of notables could be preserved, awaiting resurrection by the extraterrestrial visitors when they next came to call. Likewise, he saw in ancient Egyptian visual representations some sign of these visitors being immortalized in the local pantheon. Von Daniken, on looking over the spacious achievement represented by the Great Pyramid of Khufu at Giza, could not believe that the Egyptians, with the primitive technologies of the time, would have been capable of moving the huge blocks of stone into place. He wrote of the heave-ho proposed by people with lively imaginations (1971 114) and stated his teaching that some technology not indigenous to Egypt must have been used, choosing to entitle his chapter on the subject, Ancient Marvels or Space Travel Centres?. Furthermore, given that von Daniken believed that each of the large blocks of m asonry weighed a staggering 12 tons, he could not conceive that any method known to the Egyptians of the time would have been sufficient to move them up into the parentage and then place them atop each other (1971 101). As he looked around the local environment, with the cast off on one side and the alluvial flood plain of the Nile on the other, von Daniken was struck by the uncommon presence of wood in the region, and the large quantities of wood that would have been needed in building the pyramids. He stated that the palms that did exist in the area were much too valuable to fell because of their importance in providing shade, and dates for nutrition. Therefore, having established that large quantities of wood would have needed to be imported from abroad in articulate to build these structures, von Daniken believed that Egypt at the time of the pyramids had not sufficient tonnage of shipping to bring in the call for quantities. He therefore saw the hand of an external power w ith more advanced technologies in complemental the pyramids. Von Daniken also found what he rateed to be some intriguing mathematical aspects to the construction of the Great Pyramid. He asked, for example, Is it really a coincidence that the height of the Pyramid of Cheops Khufu multiplied by 1,000 million corresponds approximately to the outstrip between the earth and the sun? That is to say, 93 million miles (1971 99). Such arguments are interesting, but we will consider below the arbitrary nature of such arguments, which make it